Note: This was for a class project, in response to certain articles, and limited to 3 pages. Hopefully that explains how incomplete this paper is. I also ran into the deadline, ran our of time. With those disclaimers, enjoy…
—
Generally I agree with the sentiments expressed by the various writers of the articles we read. I agree things should change but I have questions regarding feasibility. In particular, some of the food articles – On Trial: Industrial Agriculture and Mean or Green are two examples – proved to be rather adept at pointing out the flaws, without suggesting much in the way of feasible solutions. I think it’s generally very important to not only point out the problems but to cast vision for the future, in both steps toward the solution and examples of current, working solutions – much as McDonough (Cradle to Cradle) and Brukardt (The natural Step to Sustainability) have done.
Feasibility aside, my other main question is that of motivation. In other words, why? Specifically, why should I do something? Why should I go to the trouble? To build new systems, to retrofit the old, to change whole industries, to do away with other industries is a huge undertaking. Even to simply rework one American life to be truly sustainable is a vast undertaking. Again, I credit environmentalism with being very adept at pointing out the flaws in our systems, but apart from the writings and reasonings of a select few, I have yet to see much in the way of motivations that are not rooted in guilt, shame, selfishness, or fear.
So what’s wrong with guilt and shame as a motivator? What’s wrong with selfish motivations? Ironically none of those motivations are sustainable. Take the speed limit laws for instance. These laws are fear-based. The average American’s motivation for keeping the speed limit is rooted in the shame of getting a ticket or the fear of losing money – which, is really a self-centered motivation at it’s core. As a result, most people push the speed limits to what they think they can get away with. They don’t truly believe in the spirit behind the law, they only obey when it is convenient or when they feel threatened. If, however, someone understands and believes it is good to have those limits, they will adhere joyfully, and even when it is not convenient. It is my belief that only obedience or expression rooted in joy is truly sustainable over a long period of time.
I am particularly concerned with the motivation of the individual. Both McDonough and the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI’s Core Principles) have both done an admirable job showing that sustainability can actually offer companies a competitive advantage, but a competitive advantage does not work for the individual. It is possible to be sustained out of personal gain, but when personal gain, or self-centeredness, is pitted against the good of others or the good of the environment, what will happen? Because after all is said and done, for the self-centered, justice issues have no real ROI save perhaps pride. The self-centered person should have no care for the world around them, so long as they are receiving what they wish without much hassle.
I see Christianity as being uniquely gifted to address the motivation behind “doing good.” The Christian Bible has much to say about God, man, creation, poverty, redemption and Christ. The bible lays out God’s plan for the world from beginning to end. This metanarrative can be summed up in four words – creation, rebellion, redemption, restoration. Each of these four stages hold implications for not only man and creation in relation to God, but also man in relation to man, and man in relation to creation.
The Bible opens with the words “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.“ (New American Standard Bible, Gen. 1.1) The Bible goes on to say, “Then God said, ‘Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.’ God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them; and God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.’” (Gen. 1.26-28) These two passages give us two ideas. One, God created everything, the heavens and the earth, which means that all creation is in some way “good” because it was created by, and is from God. And two, God created man in his image to fill, subdue and rule over the whole earth. Psalm 8.3-9 puts it like this: “When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers, the moon and the stars, which You have ordained; what is man that You take thought of him, and the son of man that You care for him? Yet You have made him a little lower than God, and You crown him with glory and majesty! You make him to rule over the works of Your hands; You have put all things under his feet, all sheep and oxen, and also the beasts of the field, the birds of the heavens and the fish of the sea, whatever passes through the paths of the seas. O LORD, our Lord, How majestic is Your name in all the earth!”
As creator, God deserves full obedience, respect and honor from His creation – which is exemplified in Psalm 8 above. Genesis 3 tells of the original rebellion against God, but every day every man continues to rebel. Every time I feel as though my job or my spouse, what I will eat or what I will wear, is more important than the Creator of the Universe, I evidence this rebellion inside me. But because God cannot be just and allow rebellion without punishment, he subjected the earth to futility. In Romans 8.19-23 Paul writes “For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now. And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body…“ So God subjected the earth and all of creation to futility, but He did so in hope. The subjection to futility is the punishment for man’s rebellion and is evident in the pain and suffering of the world. The hope spoken of is both Christ’s redeeming work and the eventual restoration of man and all creation.
Christ, in Heaven with God, was and is in perfect relationship with the Father. God sent his Son to earth as a sacrifice for the rebellion of man, in hope and from love. (John 3.16, Rom. 5.8) The bible puts it like this, “For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor, so that you through His poverty might become rich.” (2 Cor. 8:9) In other words, we were poor because of our debt to God in that we had rebelled against the Creator and had not given him what He was due. Jesus Christ was rich in the fact that His relationship with God was perfect, there was no brokenness between them – there was no rebellion. But Christ made Himself poor, He took the justice of God which demanded payment for man’s rebellion, and in doing so reconciled man to God. (Romans 4:8) Christ was the sacrifice that has made man rich, and will in the end save the world itself. With Christ’s death and subsequent resurrection, He redeemed creation in the sight of God and saved those who will believe.
The last step in God’s plan is restoration. In the end God will form a new heavens and new earth, not unlike the earth now, but the world will no longer be subject to the fall. “But according to His promise we are looking for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.” (2 Pet. 3:13) We also see that as Christ walked the earth, the miracles he did were, for the most part, restorative. He healed men and women. (Matt. 12:22, Matt. 15:30, John 9:1-7) He fed the hungry. (Matt. 14:13-21) He spent much of his time with the socially outcast and those in poverty. While Christ walked as a man He restored the broken. In Christ’s death He restored the broken. And in the end, when the time is right, God will restore all things that are broken.
So what does all of this, this metanarrative, this talk of Christ, what does all of this have to do with sustainability, with motivation, with caring for the poor, with tending to the environment? God made creation and because God charged man with the stewardship of creation, Christians have a unique reason to care for the environment – to honor and glorify God by doing His work. Because of their understanding of the fall, Christians have a unique understanding of the poverty and brokenness evidenced in the world. Because Christ made Himself poor and gave of Himself unselfishly, and because Christians know that they were all poor at one time, Christians have a unique motivation and model of radical sacrifice for, and service to the poor. And because God is moving all of history toward restoration, Christians have a unique reason to pursue justice and restoration for all in all aspects of earthly life. The truth of the matter is, Christians should care for the world much better than anyone else because their motivation should is born from a joy-filled, radical, grace-given worldview. If they truly understand the life and work of Christ, there is no way to ignore the suffering of those in poverty and the degradation of creation. In Christ, I see a unique hope of sustainable care for the environment and the poor that I do not see elsewhere.
Works Cited
Brukardt, Mary Jane. “The Natural Step to Sustainability”. Wingspread Journal. Spring 1997.
Featherstone, Lisa. “Mean or Green”. The Nation. September 11, 2006.
Holy Bible, New American Standard Version. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2002.
Horne, James E. and Maura McDermott. “On Trial: Industrial Agriculture”. The Next Green Revolution. 2001.
Keller, Timothy J. “Being the Church in Our Culture” Reform & Resurge Conference 2006. 23 Oct. 2008. <http://www.journeyon.net/media/being-the-church-in-our-culture.pdf>.
Keller, Timothy J. “Doing Justice” Reform & Resurge Conference 2006. MP3. Resurgence. 23 Oct. 2008. <http://theresurgence.com/r_r_2006_session_eight_audio_keller>.
McDonough, William and Michael Braungart. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press, 2002.
“RMI’s Core Principles.” rmi.org. 2008. Rocky Mountain Institute. 30 Oct 2008. <http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid66.php>.